Lingodhbhava - The Case of Multiple Dimensions
I left my work halfway through writing this, so let me first provide you a context.
I am researching and writing a document for
a science exhibition in my school, on the topic of black holes. While researching Time Dilation, I once again met a familiar topic I once studied briefly in the
past, the 4th dimension. For the past years, I have been deeply
interested in, and learned briefly about Hinduism, alongside its perception of
reality and the universe. After all
these years, all this information together churned in my mind, and this is the
outcome.
It is no surprise that the concepts of Hinduism
have been intertwined with new scientific discoveries time and time again. Be
it conductivity of current, the Pythagorean theorem, surgery, solar eclipses
and a lot more. But all of the above are just substantial evidence for proven
theories. There are no hypothetical situations in any of the above cases.
So why not see, if we can find a link
between an ancient script, and a hypothetical unproven theory.
Now with ourselves, we have two distinct
topics. The 4th dimension, and Lingodhbhava. Let’s uncover each of
them one at a time.
Starting with the story of Lingodhbhava.
There was once a fiery debate between Lord
Vishnu and Lord Brahma. These deities wanted a clear establishment of who was
superior to the other. Whilst in the middle of their conflict, they notice a massive
pillar of light. Emerged from the pillar of light the voice of Lord Shiva, in
the form of Lingodhbava, who challenged both Lord Brahma and Lord Vishnu to
find the source of this light.
At once, Lord Vishnu took the form of a boar
(Varaha Avatharam) and dug into the Earth to find the source. Lord Brahma assumed the form of a swan (Hamsa) and soared into the skies. Despite their maximum
effort, none of the lords could find the source of the pillar of light. While
Lord Vishnu conceded, Lord Brahma alleged that he had found the top of the “lingam”
(Here, pillar). He claimed to have found the Ketaki Flower in his hand
from atop the lingam.
Lord Shiva was enraged. He explained that
there was no end, nor a beginning to this lingam. It was eternal.
While the story does not end here, the part
explaining the concept of Lingodbhava does.
And now for the concept of the 4th
dimension. The obvious answer would be time. And that might be correct. But
have we TRULY considered all the possibilities before coming to this
conclusion?
Are there truly no more PHYSICAL dimensions?
The most popular concept when it comes to
the fourth dimension (apart from time) is the concept of tesseract. If the
above image confuses you, do not worry, as it confuses me too.
String Theory also talks about these additional dimensions, stating that they
exist in smaller scales. String theory explains that the fundamental element is
a string, whose movement can’t be captured in 3 dimensions.
A simple cartesian plane in Mathematics also fails to capture the sense of the 4th dimension for many.
I wonder why.
We the people of the present are unable to comprehend
the fourth dimension in its entirety. Perhaps we could figure something out in
the future. Or have we already figured something out in the past?
That’s when I got reminded of the story of
Lingodhbhava. While this story has no mention of the term dimensions, it brings
an important concept into the equation. The concept of Infinity.
Let me explain my thought process as simply
as I can here. Let’s say we have a conference room. A long table in the centre,
and leather chairs decked out surrounding the table. This conference room is cuboid in shape if you exclude the woodwork and paints. To measure the volume
of this room, we need three values. Length, breadth and height. You miss one value;
it becomes impossible to find the volume.
So, say the room was increased horizontally
indefinitely. You couldn’t see the end of the table, and chairs continued to
fill the open gaps as far as your eyes could see. This room was huge. It had a
table with no end and infinite chairs. Could you still find the volume
of this? No. You don’t have all three values height, length and width
anymore. This means an object with an infinite in any of its dimensions has an
indefinite volume.
Or perhaps if you label the length as x,
the volume of this room would be Height X Breadth X x.
Ok, forget volume. Can finding the area of
this room give us an idea about its size? No, it can’t. Mainly because it doesn’t
take into account all the dimensions. When we calculate the area of any 2-dimensional
Object, we consider the height to be 0. Mainly because we don’t find the
beginning or the ending of the height.
Familiar line?
The story of Lingodhbhava encapsulates the
concept of infinity, and the incapability to measure it. Sure we could assign
variables, but then the answer would be incomplete. So how do we find the true
measurement of any of these values?
Is it even possible?
In the same conference room, if we had an
idea about what lay Next, something BEYOND volume, we could have
derived the formula for the length, and eventually the volume itself.
To measure something, we need all its
dimensions, and to truly understand all its dimensions we need all the values.
If a value is missing, it must mean that it is beyond our vision (Like
infinity).
Let me repeat.
To measure something, we need all its
dimensions, and to truly understand all its dimensions we need all the values.
If a value is missing, it must mean that it is beyond our vision (Like
infinity).
And a simple question, what is the
universe?
Infinite.
There are no borders to the universe. It is
an infinite expanse in all directions and all dimensions.
There are over 6 different theories all which
suggest that there are more dimensions than just 4. Well, whether any of them
are valid isn’t known in the present, perhaps only in the future, and the
past.



